Management Styles Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Management Styles - Essay ExamplePenalties such as fines are imposed in the negative style of management. These negative style managers dominate their subordinates by set emphasis on the imposition of penalties and fines for substandard performance such as being fired or suspended from their presents line of reasonings without pay, reprimand and even, in rare occasions, insults in front of their fellow histrions.This style of management is rattling proper for most employees but may not be recommended for other employee types. The employee turnover will be higher than other management styles because the employees. This domineering management style results to lower job satisfaction because the some employees will prefer to resign than to be insulted or reprimanded in front of their motioners. This is the autocratic management style.On the opposite end, some managers use the positive style of management. The managers will give better education benefits and tornado rewards and eve n promotions for excellent and above par performances. This is the custodial management style.A third management strength style occurs when there is a mixture of both the negative and positive style of management. ... imanding after part be used and there is other situation, at work, when the positive style of giving rewards and bonuses will increase worker production outputs.Managements use of power to change organisational realities by getting others to do what they want done is advertise strengthened by the Protestant ethics during the Protestant Reformation that it is a MORAL obligation to work in order to have salvation. This ethic was one of the sparks that kindled the factory working procedures in the eighteenth century. Therefore, man felt that is a normal for a superior to order the workers to perform certain appoint tasks that will contribute to the acquirement of over-all company goals and objectives Frederic W. Taylor (Waring, 1991) studied human behaviour ( Grandjea n & Kroener, 1997) at work in his management science. He equates the organization as a cheap machine where the human workers, managers and supervisors are likened to its many an(prenominal) move or subdivisions. Each must coordinate and cooperate with each other for the smooth accomplishment of company goals. The human workers are treated just like cheap machine spare parts that can be replaced, transferred, mended and strengthened.Management has the power for the company to implement Frederic Taylors work procedures such that each task can be broken down into its smallest unit and the best person to do a specific job should be selected so that there will more products manufactured in lesser time at a better quality standard for Frederic Taylor saw that the interaction of human characteristics, social environment, task and physiologic environment, capacity, speed, durability and cost contributes much to the speedy and quality accomplishment of company goals and objectives. Taylor s method has increased