Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines Case Study Essay

Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines Case Study - Essay ExampleHowever, this may pass been counterproductive, because the airline could have then argued that there is no connection because of the different industries. The main additional source that it seems the unification missed, was to ascertain at national airlines as a comparison, instead of just looking at other self-feeder airlines.The union had several primary intents which they precious the company to face and on which they thought they could bargain productively. number 1 of all, there was the issue of raising wages. The flight confederates wanted a higher hourly rate. Also, there was the objective of increasing job security, particularly to protect flight attendants with a lot of seniority from being shoot or laid off by the airline. In addition to job security, the union also wanted expanded vacation and leave sentence, as well as better working conditions. Another objective of the union was to change the duty rig system. In the duty rig system, a flight attendant may spend a 15 hour day, commuting to an airport, waiting for the flight, and running checks, but just now get paid 6 hours, because in the duty rig system, they are only paid for time that the airplane is in the air. This seemed unfair to union representatives.The unions strategies can be separated into lead categoriesinform, involve, and convince. In the inform stage, the strategy was to keep union members as well informed as mathematical as to what was going on with the collective bargaining negotiations. In the involve strategy, the union aimed to optimize union membership participation by encouraging activities such as picketing and mini-strikes. Finally, the third strategy concentrated on convincing the airline of their grievances, and not backing down from their objectives. These strategies were more than reasonablethe only real world-beater a union has is to withhold work.Magic Carpets goals were to preserve the status quo, and to save money. They did not want to give in to union