Gun Control Essay Example for Free

gasolene Control EssayGun chequer has been a debat subject issue for all times. This essay aims to drift forward an argument against flatulency control. The essay asserts that prevalence of gun control should non be a part of the society. Society should be against gun control because people should be able to nourish themselves, the hatred rate would decrease, and people apply the ripe(p) to bear arms.Discussion The controversy regarding the gun control is uncomplete a new one nor particular to United States. Majority of the gun control laws make no demarcation between the citizens who be law breakers and those who are law abiding.Gun control laws only when entail that anyone who possess a gun is likely to be a law breaker, which is merely not a case (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 01). The purpose behind the gun control and gun crime laws is to avert the criminals from getting guns and using the guns they had acquired. However, the number of armed crimes as well as criminals has amplified during the time when gun control laws have thrived. It appears as if the actual results of gun control have not been the projected ones (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 02).Gun control laws restricts the indifferent citizens from possessing a gun, which implies that at the time of a criminal attack or a robbery, the citizen will not be likely to defend him or herself. The self defense survey conducted by Dr. Gary Kleeck shows that around 2. 1 million times, guns are used for self defense purpose in a year (Krouse, pp. 13). A gun control law will restrain the people from protecting themselves in case of a violent crime attack. This will enable the criminals to be more powerful and confident while fight people as people would not be armed.For instance pizza delivery boys keep guns to rule out themselves from being robbed. Thus, society should be against gun control because people have a regenerate to protect and defend themselves. Imposing gun control laws do not reduce crime s. However, guns in the hands of those citizens who are law abiding and physically less strong than the criminals, are the best preventions for the crimes (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 02). Criminals are provoked by self-protection and guns can thus be a disincentive. A majority of convicted American criminals have describe that they fear from attacking the victims who are armed.Their fear of encountering armed victims surpasses their fear of being caught by police (Lott, pp. 05). Robbers do not attempt to break into houses after midnight because of the probability of being shot. Thus, society should be against gun control because crimes will decrease. Keeping guns and using them for self defense is a reclaim of the citizens as laid by the constitution. The constitution wants its citizens to possess guns in order to protect and defend themselves from the criminals or the despotism of their own government. opposite than the constitutional right, self defense by keeping guns is also an inh erent basic human right of the people (Reynolds Caruth, pp. 27-29). Therefore, society should be against gun control as people have a right to bear arms. Conclusion Most of the criminals acquire guns from illegal sources. Gun control laws therefore, are not able to restrict criminals. They only restrain law abiding citizens from possessing guns which increases the crime violence therefore, society should be against gun control because people should be able to protect themselves, the crime rate would decrease, and people have the right to bear arms.