Civil Rights Movement in the United States: The Effects of the Civil Rights Movement on Race Relations within the United States

The Jim Crow System is a governing body in and through which the central idea is contrastingiation. This preeminence is make on the basis of ethnicity or dry wash. Differentiation entails the recognition that scarpers atomic number 18 different and as such, it creates a political setting that separates races such as the white-hots from the Blacks. In addition to this, it also separates and ultimately, limits or confines races such as the Blacks to a sociable line of business with corresponding social functions that be imposed on them.The Civil Rights style whitethorn be seen as a pass on of such a differentiation and segregation at heart the social sphere that it reflects the recognition of the unjust and inhumane aspect of such methods of social differentiation and social segregation. After the said movement, it has been argued that racial differentiation and segregation no longer exists within the United States, and due to this in a hotshot the Civil Rights Movement h as been successful. However, there are several contentions to such a perspective.First, the effects of the expedited death penalty of civil rights on all facets and areas of society, especially in the North, combined with the get away from the traditional means of social integration helped spark the violent bloodless backlash of the 1970s. The White Backlash is a re performary populism involving the middle, working grad moved by a sense of threat regarding the policies implemented during the time. Thus, race and racism are non to be seen as the main factors baffling for they cannot account for the White Backlash in a manner that is raw acceptable.It is of equal importance that we take into consideration the fact that the Whites resi post to the policies implemented during the time was also brought about by a general feeling of threat and the idea of being displaced in their communities. The discussions regarding racial segregation in coachs and communities and forced busing further strengthens this point. Another issue of vital importance that whitethorn be related to the idea of gentrification. This refers to the Whites reactionary stance on the implemented policies generated feelings of threat regarding two their sense of security and sense of community.It is all- chief(prenominal)(prenominal) to note that the very idea and experience of homelessness, being evicted from onenesss immediate environment and his or her social and political environment is degrading for the evicted families and individuals. The aforementioned experience generates feelings of powerlessness, anxiety, and oppression. In American history, gentrification is considered as a mechanism for the revitalization or rehabilitation of the casualties brought about by wars and conflicts both from external and internal threats.Examples of such destructive courses in history are World War I and World War II. Gentrification, as viewed by Smith, results in the displacement of lower inco me people such as laborers by the well-to-do or the middle class in the process of rehabilitating, revitalizing, and upgrading of deteriorated urban property. In so far as gentrification obliterates working class communities, displaces silly households and converts whole neighborhoods into bourgeois enclaves, the marge ideology rationalizes social differentiation and censure as natural and inevitable (Smith, 1992, p. 2). These ideas strengthen the general view that the White Backlash is largely the reaction of the social classes in the middle and concluding strata, the working class White Bostonians since the elites are in his words exempted from the chicken feed. The feeling of threat and the fear of displacement in their communities, these are important factors to consider as to why the White Backlash occurred. The problem with the frontier ideology and the process of gentrification, as I reckon, is that they pose serious threats on the very notion of a shared history.As the materially-driven significant estate industries and markets continue to flourish and the advent of deindustrialization, the easier it displaces low-income people from their immediate social environment, social and political milieu thus, endangering the very notion of a shared history. In contrast to such claims Weisbrot (1990) claims that although certain forms of injustice still exists what is important to consider are the facets of social change resulting from the aforementioned movement.He claims, like other reform movements the crusade for racial justice inevitably pretermit short of the utopian goals that sustained it. Still, if (it) is judged by the distance it traveleda record of substantial achievement unfolds (1990, p. 339). Such achievement involve school desegregation and the securing of representation and voting rights. In addition to this, Weisbrot argued that such developments may be seen as the result of the development of tolerance and hence pluralism within the A merican community.He claims that as a result of the aforementioned movement, pluralism is much firmly rooted in American values than ever onward (1990, p. 342). However, the fast-paced implementation that is, of the recognition of civil rights be regarded as underlying rights that ought to be granted to every citizen of the state and not save to a selected few, the Whites unraveled structures and ideologies of society too fast most importantly the historically embedded ideas of race and class without providing or setting up new structures for what was unraveled.This presents the second critique to the fabricated success of the Civil Rights Movement. Third, educational equality and racial equality were never achieved in the expedited implementation of the civil rights through desegregation, forced busing and affirmative action policies. The federal government was forcing busing, frugals, and housing all at the same time. This leads to wickerworks point that the problem with th e integration plan was how extensive it was and how baffling it was to implement. This is precisely because of the aforementioned reasons, which serve as warrants to my second argument.The question regarding the expedited implementation of such policies fails to consider that such radical changes will result to lay waste to consequences. The problem is, so to speak, much more(prenominal) complex. As wickerwork suggests, economic as well as political empowerment if African-American disadvantagesare to be overcome (1996, p. 347). The problem with the Civil Rights Movement is that it was not universal. It was not universal in the sense that the Blacks themselves are not unified in their struggles for racial justice and liberation.It was not able to gain an inter-subjective consensus not only from human rights advocates but also most especially from the Blacks themselves. The movement lacks what may be called a unity of purpose which entails unified and collective actions. This is i n accordance with Wickers argument regarding the failure of the aforementioned movement. Wicker (1996) contends that the Civil Rights Movement failed to enable racial integration due to the continue separation of whites and blacks into hostile and unequal classes which leads to political deadlock, economic inequity, and social impertinence that mark American life (p. 345).In summary, although the implementation of civil rights on all facets and areas of society created changes on the realms of the social, political, and economic but there corpse a question whether such huge and radical changes are legal since the phenomenon in itself is deeply embedded in the culture of the American society. True, the American society and its political culture do have problems. In the incase of racial and educational equality and the expedited implementation of the civil rights, however, the issues are more intricate. In order for racial inequalities to end, American society must be prepared for huge and radical changes