Cicso Systems vs Huawei Technologies :: Lawsuit Law Intellectual Property Essays

Cicso Systems vs Huawei Technologies I. lake herring Systems files lawsuit against Huawei Technologies lake herring Systems filed a lawsuit against Huawei Technologies on January 23, 2003 claiming that Huawei had copied, misappropriated, and infringed on ciscos smart property in its rival line of low-cost networking routers.1 Cisco Systems is an constancy leader in providing networking equipment for voice and data transfer. Huawei Technologies is Chinas tip manufacturer of telecom and network equipment gear and is viewed by analysts as a formidable competitor to Cisco2. II. Details of the lawsuitCiscos everyegations allow in the following3 . write of IOS source code IOS (Internetworking Operating System) is Ciscos proprietary operate form. Cisco claims that Huaweis operating system contains text strings, file names, and even bugs that are identical to those in Ciscos IOS source code. . Copying of Ciscos practiced reenforcement Cisco alleges that whole portions of text from Ciscos copyrighted technical documentation are found in Huaweis user manuals for their Quidway routers and switches. . Copying of Command Line user interface A Command Line Interface (CLI) is the interface through which a user issues commands to a router. Cisco claims that lengthened portions of its CLI and help screens appear verbatim in Huaweis operating system for its Quidway routers and switches. . Patent infringement Cisco alleges that Huawei is infringing at least fivesome Cisco patents related to proprietary routing protocols. Cisco wants a preliminary and ageless injunction prohibiting the use, sales, marketing, and distribution of Huaweis Quidway routers and switches. The suit includes an order to triple all damages, an amount to be determined by a jury during a trial.4 Cisco also took action against a Huawei distributor in the linked Kingdom. Spot Distribution received a cease and desist letter for distributing Huawei products that allegedly infringe Ciscos apt property.5 Cisco filed the movement in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,6 nearby Plano, Texas, where it has a subsidiary. The court is reputed to be knowledgeable about patent and intellectual property infringement cases, sympathetic to patent holders, and quick to issue injunctions. age patents granted in the United States are only enforceable in the United States, copyright laws are enforced worldwide.